Assessing performance in organizations


Performance criteria: Schneider and Scmitt in Brewerton, P. & Milward, L. (2001)”those behaviours at work that competent observers can agree constitute necessary standard of excellence to be achieved in order for the individual and the organization to both accomplish their goals.”

Most organizational research is concerned with performance, sometimes at the level of the group, but often at the level of the individual (123). Additioanlly every research question will come with assumptions. 

Ex from Table 8.1 Typical performance/outcome criteria at various levels of analysis 

Performance

Individual–sales achieved

Group/team–cohesiveness  

Organizational–sales volume 

Critical Analysis 

  • Objectivity
  • Reliability/validity
  • Discrimiability
  • Accessibility 

Individual performance measure outcomes, such as typist speed are regarded as the most useful and least contaminated by error (125).

Rating effects

Halo: “occurs when the rater tends to give the same level of rating across all criteria”. 

Cultural tendency, severity, and leniency–the rater uses part of a rating scale due to a personal preference. 

Context–differences in individual ratings of employees when alone or in a group setting. 

Similar-to-me raters make judgements as to the similarity or dissimilarity of the person they are rating to themselves, and this affects the judgement of performance.  (128)

Brewerton, P. & Milward, L. (2001). Organizational Research Methods: A Guide for Students and Researchers. London: Sage.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s